Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 12 of 12
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Feb 2013
      Location
      Ft Worth, TX
      Posts
      186
      Country Flag: United States

      Looking to upgrade from LS1 Camaro brakes

      I've got LS1 brakes front and rear on my Chevelle with a Wilwood pedal/master cylinder setup but I'm not entirely happy with the stopping power. I've been looking at swapping the front brakes to the Brembos off of a 5th gen Camaro but I just want to make sure that's the best option (it's certainly the cheapest). Here are the 3 I've been considering:

      1. 5th gen Brembos. Cheap and will bolt on with a bit of machining to the rotor.

      2. C6 Z06. I've read that the calipers have some issues with spreading and the "padlets" are goofy but how would the overall stopping power compare to the Brembos?

      3. Some sort of aftermarket Wilwood setup. Ideally a 6 piston caliper kit that can use a stock Z06 rotor to keep the price down. Would the aftermarket calipers have much advantage over an OE caliper from a Camaro or Corvette?

      People say the LS1 rears were oversized compared to the front brakes so I should be able to get away with just upgrading the front, right? Keeping the Camaro parking brake setup limits my options for the rear axle.

      1970 Chevelle: 6.0 L96, T56, Strange 9 Inch, Ridetech Coilovers, Wilwood brakes

      1978 Firebird: 6.0 LQ4, T56

      2007 Sierra 2500HD LBZ



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      The City of Fountains
      Posts
      15,975
      Country Flag: United States
      Before swapping parts, I would make sure that your current system is working optimally. What exactly are you not happy about? Is it a power system or manual? What size MC are you using? Is the system properly bled? Etc...

      Andrew
      1970 GTO Version 3.0
      1967 Cougar build
      GM High-Tech Performance feature
      My YouTube Channel Please Subscribe!
      Instagram @projectgattago
      Dr. EFI
      I deliver what EFI promises.
      Remote Holley EFI tuning.
      Please get in touch if I can be of service.

      "You were the gun, your voice was the trigger, your bravery was the barrel, your eyes were the bullets." ~ Her

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Feb 2013
      Location
      Ft Worth, TX
      Posts
      186
      Country Flag: United States
      I don't have a lot of confidence in being able to make a panic stop on the highway, it also takes a bit more force than I would expect when slowing to a complete stop. It's a manual system with 3/4" bore in the back and 7/8" bore up front. The pedal is firm so I think the brakes are bled well.
      1970 Chevelle: 6.0 L96, T56, Strange 9 Inch, Ridetech Coilovers, Wilwood brakes

      1978 Firebird: 6.0 LQ4, T56

      2007 Sierra 2500HD LBZ


    4. #4
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      The City of Fountains
      Posts
      15,975
      Country Flag: United States
      So it's a dual MC system?

      Andrew
      1970 GTO Version 3.0
      1967 Cougar build
      GM High-Tech Performance feature
      My YouTube Channel Please Subscribe!
      Instagram @projectgattago
      Dr. EFI
      I deliver what EFI promises.
      Remote Holley EFI tuning.
      Please get in touch if I can be of service.

      "You were the gun, your voice was the trigger, your bravery was the barrel, your eyes were the bullets." ~ Her

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Dec 2008
      Location
      Detroit
      Posts
      2,585
      Country Flag: United States
      As far as the C6 Z06 calipers, you can use a one piece pad. Also, you haven't said what pads you are using in your current setup?

      Chris
      Big dreams, small pockets....

      Chris--
      '72 Cutlass S LSA/T56 Magnum
      Bowler Performance, Rushforth Wheels, ATS, Holley EFI, KORE3, Ridetech

      Project Motor City Madness

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Mountain Springs, Texas
      Posts
      4,495
      Country Flag: United States
      I would try a pad upgrade first....

      Don
      1969 Camaro - LSA 6L90E AME sub/IRS
      1957 Buick Estate Wagon
      1959 El Camino - Ironworks frame
      1956 Cameo - full C5 suspension/drivetrain
      1959 Apache Fleetside

    7. #7
      Join Date
      May 2011
      Location
      Chippewa Falls, WI
      Posts
      290
      Country Flag: United States
      It seems part wise you have a good setup, but I would agree with pad choice. Going from stockish pads to a Hawk HP+ made a good difference on my Chevelle. I am running ls1 discs with a 7/8 wilwood tandem master cylinder. You will have more travel/effort with a manual setup over a vac boosted typical of newer cars. Panic stop style braking needs very sensitive and touchy output with less input from driver. Not ideal for performance systems with the feedback and feel of manual brakes.

      You will not gain any force with going with 6 piston or larger setups. Your main advantage on those systems are larger rotor for heat dissipation and stiffer clamping forces over the 2 piston floating setup with the LS1/C5 style setups. This would not help your goals of more responsive panic stopping.

      Smaller bore will net you more clamping force, but with more pedal travel, and larger bore the opposite, less pedal travel, less clamping force.
      Justin N.

      1966 Chevelle
      1992 GMC Typhoon
      1989 Jeep Wrangler CJ 6.0 Twin Turbo
      1981 Jeep CJ7

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Feb 2013
      Location
      Ft Worth, TX
      Posts
      186
      Country Flag: United States
      It is a dual MC system. The pads are just standard ceramic replacements so there's definitely room for improvement there but I figured if I'm going to spend the money on good pads/rotors it should be for a better brake system. I understand that clamping force will remain largely the same for a given pedal input but the larger rotor diameter should provide a better mechanical advantage for that clamping force. Would the difference be so negligible that I'd be better off just buying some Hawk pads for the LS1 brakes?
      1970 Chevelle: 6.0 L96, T56, Strange 9 Inch, Ridetech Coilovers, Wilwood brakes

      1978 Firebird: 6.0 LQ4, T56

      2007 Sierra 2500HD LBZ


    9. #9
      Join Date
      Dec 2016
      Posts
      35
      The 5th Gen Brembos and C6 Z06 calipers will both reduce your caliper piston area which will take you in the wrong direction. Your current setup (LS1) has 4.81 in^2 of piston area, the 5th Gen Brembos have 4.29 in^2 and the Z06 have 3.98 in^2. You'd need an even smaller bore master cylinder to make up the difference. (With the Z06 calipers you would need really aggressive pads or to add a power booster or hydroboost and go up in MC size) I have a different suggestion:

      1. Keep your LS1 calipers

      2. Buy a set of C5 caliper abutments and pins

      3. Buy a set of C5 rotors and pads

      Bought right you're in for under $500, increased rotor diameter of 0.88" and increased clamping force 8.4%.

      You still need to change to a performance pad, but you can package that with rotors. Powerstop has packages for street or track. In your case I'd suggest street.

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Feb 2013
      Location
      Ft Worth, TX
      Posts
      186
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by RT66ProTouring View Post
      The 5th Gen Brembos and C6 Z06 calipers will both reduce your caliper piston area which will take you in the wrong direction. Your current setup (LS1) has 4.81 in^2 of piston area, the 5th Gen Brembos have 4.29 in^2 and the Z06 have 3.98 in^2. You'd need an even smaller bore master cylinder to make up the difference. (With the Z06 calipers you would need really aggressive pads or to add a power booster or hydroboost and go up in MC size) I have a different suggestion:

      1. Keep your LS1 calipers

      2. Buy a set of C5 caliper abutments and pins

      3. Buy a set of C5 rotors and pads

      Bought right you're in for under $500, increased rotor diameter of 0.88" and increased clamping force 8.4%.

      You still need to change to a performance pad, but you can package that with rotors. Powerstop has packages for street or track. In your case I'd suggest street.
      Would the C5 abutments space the calipers correctly with the LS1 mounting points or would I need a new adapter?
      1970 Chevelle: 6.0 L96, T56, Strange 9 Inch, Ridetech Coilovers, Wilwood brakes

      1978 Firebird: 6.0 LQ4, T56

      2007 Sierra 2500HD LBZ


    11. #11
      Join Date
      Dec 2016
      Posts
      35
      You would need a different adapter. Sorry, I failed to mention that.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Feb 2013
      Location
      Ft Worth, TX
      Posts
      186
      Country Flag: United States
      If I have to change adapters, it wouldn't cost much more to step up to a used set of Brembos. I've been playing around with a calculator and it seems like stepping down the front master cylinder to .75" in addition to the Brembo calipers would have next to no net change in pedal travel because of the smaller piston size. It would substantially increase the front rotor torque though. Does this train of thought make sense? It would shift a ton of bias to the front but that could be corrected with the balance bar without sacrificing stopping power.
      1970 Chevelle: 6.0 L96, T56, Strange 9 Inch, Ridetech Coilovers, Wilwood brakes

      1978 Firebird: 6.0 LQ4, T56

      2007 Sierra 2500HD LBZ






    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com